Re: configuration: writable MIB modules versus NETCONF/YANG modules
Andy Bierman <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:55:17 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABCOCHTVAqyXBQGjok=sojSHMSxP2CoFS1n27YHnn3c9rK7bqw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < [email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:06:52PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Note that none of the people asking for more text have provided any > > proposed changes. > > > > WGs should use the monitoring protocol(s) that best fit their > > requirements. > > > > How's that? > > I do not see the value of such a statement since I assume this to be > the default for any protocol selection. > > OK -- so no need for any statement on monitoring since there are no specific recommendations to make. > /js > Andy _______________________________________________ OPS-AREA mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area