Re: configuration: writable MIB modules versus NETCONF/YANG modules

On 18/02/2014 08:55, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder 
> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:06:52PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Note that none of the people asking for more text have provided any
>     > proposed changes.
>     >
>     >    WGs should use the monitoring protocol(s) that best fit their
>     > requirements.
>     >
>     > How's that?
>
>     I do not see the value of such a statement since I assume this to be
>     the default for any protocol selection.
>
>
> OK -- so no need for any statement on monitoring since there are no 
> specific
> recommendations to make.
Exactly.

Regards, Benoit
>
>     /js
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-AREA mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area

_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area