Re: meeting materials MUST be online well BEFOREthesession
"David Harrington" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Yes, we could force presentations/meetings to be canceled if > slides/agendas aren't available. But the question is: how does this > removal of work items actually benefit us? It actually will > inhibit our > already too-slow work process, not help it. > (Another option is to force them to give a talk at a > microphone without > their slides; it'd still allow discussion without the presentation > material ;-) I think the "another option" suffers from the same problem as the cancellation option. I do not see how forcing people to discuss things at the microphone without the benefit of the slides they submitted late, benefits the IETF. I think this restriction would inhibit progress. Working for a Chinese company whose personnel often have difficulty attending meetings due to travel budget or visa concerns, and who frequently utilize our tools for remote participation, I am very sensitive to the importance of having the slides available for remote participants. But at this point in time, remote particiants are still a small minority in the IETF community, and penalizing the IETF community in attendance at the meeting because the remote participants might be inconvenienced does not make much sense to me. If we want to be serious about supporting remote participants (and I think we should), I think there are a lot of things besides having slides available that are important. In Dublin, as I watched chairs sometimes talk into their mikes, but not consistently, and chairs counting hands but not verbally reporting the results, and people at the mikes rushing through what they had to say rather than thinking about how well remote participants would be able to understand them, I thought to myself maybe every chair should be required to actually listen to and replay their recorded sessions to see just how difficult it is to be a remote participant in their WG. That might have a much greater effect toward supporting remote participants than cancelling presentations. dbh