Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright
"C. M. Heard" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+1 also (though I really don't have a stake in the outcome). One of the things that should probably be discussed is whether the issues brought up in the attached e-mail (downgrading some of the MUSTSs to SHOULDs) should be addressed under the head of bug fixes. //cmh On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, David B Harrington wrote: > +1 > dbh > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juergen > > Schoenwaelder > > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:22 AM > > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > > Cc: C. M. Heard; MIB Doctors (E-mail); OPS Area (E-mail) > > Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:14:46AM +0200, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > > > I have some good news to share. Randy Presuhn stepped ahead and accepted > > > to be the editor of 4181bis. Thanks, Randy! > > > > > > I have two questions: > > > > > > 1. OPSAWG (which did not exist by the time 4181 was edited and > > > published) seems to me to be the natural home for 4181bis. Does anybody > > > see any problem with this? If all agree we shall move discussions to > > > [email protected] > > > > > > 2. What should be the scope of 4181bis? > > > > Bug fixes and alignment to current IETF procedures and rules (although > > the last thing might be an endless undertaking ;-). As little rewrite > > as possible if you ask me. > > > > /js > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > > MIB-DOCTORS mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > > > _______________________________________________ OPS-AREA mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 8.7 KB) - not displayed