Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A84CEC@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
I think that we should consider also the following: 

1. Update the tools information. We refer now
http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-review-tools.html but is the information
there accurate, with smicng support aparently discontinued? 

2. information about templates - refer to RFC 5249 ? 

Also - is it time to move this discussion to OPSAWG? 

Dan
(speaking as contributor)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of C. M. Heard
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:27 PM
> To: David B Harrington
> Cc: 'MIB Doctors (E-mail)'; 'OPS Area (E-mail)'
> Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright
> 
> +1 also (though I really don't have a stake in the outcome).
> 
> One of the things that should probably be discussed is 
> whether the issues brought up in the attached e-mail 
> (downgrading some of the MUSTSs to SHOULDs) should be 
> addressed under the head of bug fixes.
> 
> //cmh
> 
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, David B Harrington wrote:
> > +1
> > dbh
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juergen 
> > > Schoenwaelder
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:22 AM
> > > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> > > Cc: C. M. Heard; MIB Doctors (E-mail); OPS Area (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on 
> > > Copyright
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:14:46AM +0200, Romascanu, Dan 
> (Dan) wrote:
> > > > I have some good news to share. Randy Presuhn stepped ahead and 
> > > > accepted to be the editor of 4181bis. Thanks, Randy!
> > > > 
> > > > I have two questions: 
> > > > 
> > > > 1. OPSAWG (which did not exist by the time 4181 was edited and
> > > > published) seems to me to be the natural home for 
> 4181bis.  Does 
> > > > anybody see any problem with this? If all agree we shall move 
> > > > discussions to [email protected]
> > > > 
> > > > 2.  What should be the scope of 4181bis? 
> > > 
> > > Bug fixes and alignment to current IETF procedures and rules 
> > > (although the last thing might be an endless undertaking ;-). As 
> > > little rewrite as possible if you ask me.
> > > 
> > > /js
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 
> Bremen, Germany
> > > Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors
> > > 
> > 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.