Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A84CEC@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> |
I think that we should consider also the following: 1. Update the tools information. We refer now http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-review-tools.html but is the information there accurate, with smicng support aparently discontinued? 2. information about templates - refer to RFC 5249 ? Also - is it time to move this discussion to OPSAWG? Dan (speaking as contributor) > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of C. M. Heard > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:27 PM > To: David B Harrington > Cc: 'MIB Doctors (E-mail)'; 'OPS Area (E-mail)' > Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright > > +1 also (though I really don't have a stake in the outcome). > > One of the things that should probably be discussed is > whether the issues brought up in the attached e-mail > (downgrading some of the MUSTSs to SHOULDs) should be > addressed under the head of bug fixes. > > //cmh > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, David B Harrington wrote: > > +1 > > dbh > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juergen > > > Schoenwaelder > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:22 AM > > > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > > > Cc: C. M. Heard; MIB Doctors (E-mail); OPS Area (E-mail) > > > Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on > > > Copyright > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:14:46AM +0200, Romascanu, Dan > (Dan) wrote: > > > > I have some good news to share. Randy Presuhn stepped ahead and > > > > accepted to be the editor of 4181bis. Thanks, Randy! > > > > > > > > I have two questions: > > > > > > > > 1. OPSAWG (which did not exist by the time 4181 was edited and > > > > published) seems to me to be the natural home for > 4181bis. Does > > > > anybody see any problem with this? If all agree we shall move > > > > discussions to [email protected] > > > > > > > > 2. What should be the scope of 4181bis? > > > > > > Bug fixes and alignment to current IETF procedures and rules > > > (although the last thing might be an endless undertaking ;-). As > > > little rewrite as possible if you ask me. > > > > > > /js > > > > > > -- > > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 > Bremen, Germany > > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > MIB-DOCTORS mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > > > > > >