Re: Heads up
james woodyatt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 8, 2010, at 20:24 , Erik Kline wrote: > > Didn't Akira Nakagawa/KDDI present something like this a few meetings ago? I can't recall clearly... It was in Chicago, if I recall correctly. At which point Tony Hain joked that we should direct IANA to just turn over the entire remaining free pool for that use. Personally, I'd prefer to take Tony's suggestion as a serious proposal. A single /8 isn't enough, is it? For NAT444 to be a really workable architecture, we've got to give over enough addresses that service providers can handle at least a hundred million subscriber addresses in the same address realm, right? -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, communications engineering _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops