Re: Heads up
Cameron Byrne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:50 PM, james woodyatt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2010, at 20:24 , Erik Kline wrote: >> >> Didn't Akira Nakagawa/KDDI present something like this a few meetings ago? I can't recall clearly... > > It was in Chicago, if I recall correctly. At which point Tony Hain joked that we should direct IANA to just turn over the entire remaining free pool for that use. > > Personally, I'd prefer to take Tony's suggestion as a serious proposal. A single /8 isn't enough, is it? For NAT444 to be a really workable architecture, we've got to give over enough addresses that service providers can handle at least a hundred million subscriber addresses in the same address realm, right? > I need at least 10x /8s to number my current network, and that does not account for growth. Verizon Wireless uses 40+ instances of 10.0.0.0/8 Cameron _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops