Re: [OPS-AREA] Heads up
Arturo Servin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Not sure if IANA can issue something shorter than a /8. -as On 9 Nov 2010, at 06:34, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote: > Greetings, > > Fred, I think, mis-typed. The request would go to IANA. The space, to answer the other question is either /10 or /12. > > Chris > > On 09Nov2010, at 15.21, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Dave, >> >> On 2010-11-09 17:09, David Conrad wrote: >>> I'm confused, but that may be because of lack of information. >>> >>> Ignoring for the time being the advisability of doing this, if we're talking about a new pseudo-RFC 1918 block, why is it going to a regional registry? Presumably its use would be global. Shouldn't it be a direct allocation by IANA as a result of IETF action? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_run >> >> Brian >> >>> Regards, >>> -drc >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> >>>>> Chris Liljenstolpe has a proposal that he made in ops-area today, for >>>>> a mechanism to create what amounts to an RFC 1918 prefix, but >>>>> specifically for use in NAT444 ISP configurations. It involves a >>>>> request to the ARIN board. He will write a quick draft and post it >>>>> this week, discuss this Thursday in the Ops WG, and call the question >>>>> in Friday's v6ops meeting. Due to the real time nature of the >>>>> discussion, I'll ask folks to be aware and follow it. >>>> i have been fighting against this wrong-headed proposal for a couple of >>>> years, since they first tried it in apnic, from which we sent them to >>>> ietf. >>>> >>>> it is a hack which perpetuates their kludge and does not help ipv6 one >>>> little bit. >>>> >>>> they made the current mess and this just delays the inevitable and >>>> they'll want some other silliness to bail them out next time. >>>> >>>> the space will be immediately be used by others, and thus will defeat >>>> the alleged purpose of giving them private space with which to stitch >>>> together 1918 customers. >>>> >>>> it will cement in and perpetuate the n-level ipv4 nat model. >>>> >>>> randy >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> v6ops mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> v6ops mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> OPS-AREA mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area >> > > -- > Christopher LILJENSTOLPE Telstra o +61 3 8647 6389 > pgp key https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops