Re: [OPSAWG] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs

Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf-Q+9Y6h9iBBLj4SYmN/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Well Mark, that wasn't much of an off-list.  I won't take offense, however.  Yes, I do work for 1221.  I've been there for 18 months, and am not familiar with your reference to 1/8 for Telstra.  The only knowledge I have of 1/8 at 1221 is that we just got a chunk of it from APNIC in our latest assignment.  Not sure what you are referring to about "announcing" 1/8 to 1221 for monitoring purposes, was this when Geoff was there?  We have been making similar requests for a while.

Yes, it is.

	Chris

On 11Nov2010, at 21.57, Mark Smith wrote:

> Off list. Knowing who Christopher is currently working for/with,
> and no offence to him, because I don't know how long he has worked
> there, his organisation know all about 1/8, because I've seen his
> organisation ask for 1/8 to be turned into an RFC1918 address at an
> IPv6 conference a few years ago - and I've been at another ISP on the
> receiving end of being asked to announce it to them for nothing more
> than monitoring purposes. Geoff Huston used to work for them for a quite
> while too ;-)
> 
> (Australia is a pretty small place :-) )
> 
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:41:46 +0100
> Marco Hogewoning <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> Unless I miss something, the proposal is not at all to add a 4th prefix to the 3 of RFC1918.
>>> It is only that one /8 be neither in the global address space nor in the private address space of RFC 1918. 
>>> Thus, ISPs can use it in place of the 10/8 they use today, and thus eliminate conflicts with some of the customer sites that use 10/8.
>>> One /8 is necessary AND SUFFICIENT to do this.
>> 
>> 
>> And won't solve a thing as within days people start using it like it's 10/8. Oh, I'm merging two companies, address conflict, know what let's use XX/8. For more examples, see the work of Geoff Huston and others on the traffic in 1/8. People weren't supposed to use that one as well.
>> 
>> MarcoH
>> (no hats)
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 

---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 455 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.