Re: [OPSAWG] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf-Q+9Y6h9iBBLj4SYmN/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well Mark, that wasn't much of an off-list. I won't take offense, however. Yes, I do work for 1221. I've been there for 18 months, and am not familiar with your reference to 1/8 for Telstra. The only knowledge I have of 1/8 at 1221 is that we just got a chunk of it from APNIC in our latest assignment. Not sure what you are referring to about "announcing" 1/8 to 1221 for monitoring purposes, was this when Geoff was there? We have been making similar requests for a while. Yes, it is. Chris On 11Nov2010, at 21.57, Mark Smith wrote: > Off list. Knowing who Christopher is currently working for/with, > and no offence to him, because I don't know how long he has worked > there, his organisation know all about 1/8, because I've seen his > organisation ask for 1/8 to be turned into an RFC1918 address at an > IPv6 conference a few years ago - and I've been at another ISP on the > receiving end of being asked to announce it to them for nothing more > than monitoring purposes. Geoff Huston used to work for them for a quite > while too ;-) > > (Australia is a pretty small place :-) ) > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:41:46 +0100 > Marco Hogewoning <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Unless I miss something, the proposal is not at all to add a 4th prefix to the 3 of RFC1918. >>> It is only that one /8 be neither in the global address space nor in the private address space of RFC 1918. >>> Thus, ISPs can use it in place of the 10/8 they use today, and thus eliminate conflicts with some of the customer sites that use 10/8. >>> One /8 is necessary AND SUFFICIENT to do this. >> >> >> And won't solve a thing as within days people start using it like it's 10/8. Oh, I'm merging two companies, address conflict, know what let's use XX/8. For more examples, see the work of Geoff Huston and others on the traffic in 1/8. People weren't supposed to use that one as well. >> >> MarcoH >> (no hats) >> _______________________________________________ >> v6ops mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > --- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 455 B) - not displayed