Re: [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs

David Conrad <drc-/HHyZTb1IPVPm/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
> 	I don't think that 44/8 is reasonable (look at http://noh.ucsd.edu/~brian/amprnets.txt), or did you mean 45/8 (just recently returned)?

No, I meant 44/8.  I am aware that it is in use by a few ham operators, however I would think they given the sparseness of usage, those ham operators could renumber in other parts of 44/8, freeing up a block of sufficient size for your purposes.

Regards,
-drc

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.