Re: [OPSAWG] [v6ops] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops,gmane.ietf.v6ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I know. I was trying to clear up if he meant 45/8 or 44/8. The problem with 44/8 is that it is in use in networks that may be connected to RG's. Chris On 15Nov2010, at 11.38, Arturo Servin wrote: > > On 14 Nov 2010, at 13:36, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I don't think that 44/8 is reasonable (look at http://noh.ucsd.edu/~brian/amprnets.txt), or did you mean 45/8 (just recently returned)? >> >> Chris >> > > 45/8 (not all but a big chunk of it) was returned to ARIN, not to IANA. > > Regards, > -as > > > --- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc _______________________________________________ OPS-AREA mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 455 B) - not displayed