Re: [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs
Richard Hartmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 19:02, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I meant 44/8. I am aware that it is in use by a few ham operators, > however I would think they given the sparseness of usage, those ham > operators could renumber in other parts of 44/8, freeing up a block of > sufficient size for your purposes. FWIW, 44.200.0.0/13 is unused. Renumbering is not realistic, but they have enough sparseness in the upper ranges not to need 44.200.0.0/13, ever. I would say asking can't hurt though I am still not sure if NAT444 is a good idea. Richard _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops