Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs
Michael Newbery <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 16/11/2010, at 12:38 PM, David Conrad wrote: > On Nov 15, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Michael Newbery wrote: >> NAT444 doesn't solve their looming next problem---that of being unable to access the (rapidly) increasing IPv6-only Internet, and absent working NAT46 and with no likely prospect of same, the ONLY way they will get this access is by upgrading their CPE. > >> >> Am I missing something obvious? > > When do you expect there to be any commercially viable sites or services that are reachable via IPv6 only? It's not just the 'hosts'. A large amount of traffic is peer to peer, and I don't mean file sharing. If you only have an IPv4 address and want to game, or VoIP to someone with only an IPv6 address, then you are going to be upset. _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.2 KB) - not displayed