Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs
Martin Millnert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:38 -1000, David Conrad wrote: > On Nov 15, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Michael Newbery wrote: > > NAT444 doesn't solve their looming next problem---that of being unable to access the (rapidly) increasing IPv6-only Internet, and absent working NAT46 and with no likely prospect of same, the ONLY way they will get this access is by upgrading their CPE. > > > > > Am I missing something obvious? > > When do you expect there to be any commercially viable sites or services that are reachable via IPv6 only? > > Regards, > -drc Either your question or my interpretation of it seems to be malformed, because I see several commercially viable (or so one would assume, at least by appearance) websites reachable via IPv6-only: anticimex@natalie:~$ dig google.com aaaa +short 2a00:1450:8001::93 anticimex@natalie:~$ dig www.v6.facebook.com aaaa +short 2620:0:1cfe:face:b00c::3 Now add NAT64, and the web should work increasingly fine for an increasing amount of sites from a host with IPv6-only. Additionally, there are rumors of CDN(s) becoming IPv6-capable *very* soon. Cheers, -- Martin Millnert <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops