Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike-uVNFFiCRr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Organization | People's Front Against WWW |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, David Conrad wrote: > b) having somebody go to one of the RIRs and get the space, then making > that space NAT444 space for everybody (e.g., like what Microsoft did > with 169.254.0.0/16) Isn't 169.254.0.0/16 an excellent network to use for NAT444 ? I agree that it's not that huge, but it's still 64k addresses, one would have to make sure the CGN can handle interface context (multiple instances of the same space) and then one would be good to go. It's there, using LL between CPE and ISP actually sounds perfect, that's what I want to do for IPv6 as well :P -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike-uVNFFiCRr/[email protected] _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops