RE: Real time applications on LTNs or 2.5/3G networks
[email protected] Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:23:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pilc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Phil, Thanks for the pointer to sctp. At first glance it looks interesting so I should take some look at it as well. However for the intend I have with a paper it is probably not the most usefull now. My intend with the paper is first to support application developers in creating applications that work well over GPRS (KPN is a mobile operator and we would love a lot of fine applications ), second some of the conclusions may be important for adding additional hooks between the application and the TCP stack (e.g. ioctl for reading current delay estimates and cwindows to adjust application layer times), third actualy write some possibilities on tailering for example Nagle or Limited Transmit to be even more aggressive. The problem with sctp is that on the short term it is not widely available for most platforms (or will it?). This makes it not an option for my primary goal. As you will know IT Economics is a bit down at the moment, so my time effort in investigating realy new things will be rather low. My knowledge is mostly built on practical experience doing measurements on GPRS and RT Applications. Best regards, Ruud Schramp > -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Neumiller [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: vrijdag 12 juli 2002 16:02 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [pilc] Real time applications on LTNs or 2.5/3G networks > > > Hello Ruud, > > I have one request for your study. Please also investigate > SCTP's use in wireless. SCTP is > defined in RFC2960 also see http://www.sctp.org/. There is > not much (if anything) published > on this currently, and if you are conducting some > experiments, it would be very interesting to > compare SCTP with TCP in your experiments. > > SCTP originated at Motorola and was subsequently heavily > modified and improved in the > IETF transport area. In our lab work at Mot we found it to > be quite useful for wireless links > as well, although that aspect has not been widely publicized. > In particular, the multi-homing > feature can be used for path/route diversity in cellular and > ad hoc networks. > > Also, w/respect to TCP and wireless, there are several > excellent papers that describe the > downfalls. Randy Katz's work at U.C. Berkley is particularly > interesting. > > Best regards, > > Phil Neumiller > _______________________________________________ pilc mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pilc http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/