RE: draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-01.txt
"Pana, Mircea" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:54:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kurt, Thank you for the clarification. The intent was to indicate (& emphasize) the fact that items of the previously defined schema are no longer used. Alternate schema items are provided by the draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema specification. Is there a formal mechanism that specifications can use to indicate the deprecation of LDAP schema items? Thanks, Mircea. -----Original Message----- From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 8:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Policy] draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-01.txt In regards to the use of OBSOLETE keyword, please note that this is NOT a mechanism for specifications to indicate that a particular schema item is deprecated, but a mechanism for directory administrators to mark schema as inactive in the subschema. See draft-ietf-ldapbis-models (or X.501(93)). Kurt _______________________________________________ Policy mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy