RE: draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-01.txt

At 11:54 AM 4/23/2003, Pana, Mircea wrote:
>Kurt,
>
>Thank you for the clarification. The intent was to indicate (& emphasize)
>the fact that items of the previously defined schema are no longer used.
>Alternate schema items are provided by the
>draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema specification.
>
>Is there a formal mechanism that specifications can use to indicate the
>deprecation of LDAP schema items?

Just say so in prose.


>Thanks,
>Mircea.
>  
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 8:48 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Policy] draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-01.txt
>
>
>In regards to the use of OBSOLETE keyword, please note that
>this is NOT a mechanism for specifications to indicate that
>a particular schema item is deprecated, but a mechanism for
>directory administrators to mark schema as inactive in the
>subschema.  See draft-ietf-ldapbis-models (or X.501(93)).
>
>Kurt
>
>_______________________________________________
>Policy mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy