RE: Revised Draft

Bert, please accept the current draft of this information model and begin 
the IESG processing to start the IETF last call, etc.  The editor has made 
the corrections you have requested, and the working group is happy with the 
changes (or so burned out that they can not be unhappy.)

Yours,
Joel

PS: Again many thanks to Bob for his editing work.

At 03:02 PM 5/20/2003 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>Mmm.. on page 46 and following I see afew FALSEFALSE values.
>Is that correct? If not, then you can keep that to be
>fixed at a later point.
>
>Same for [DIFF-MIB] Refernce, it should refernece RFC3289
>
>For those who want to see the I-Ds with colored changes,
>See
>    http://psg.com/~bwijnen/qpim.html
>    http://psg.com/~bwijnen/qddim.html
>
>Is the doc ready for me to send it into IETF Last Call?
>
>Thanks,
>Bert
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: donderdag 8 mei 2003 20:15
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Policy] Revised Draft
> >
> >
> > The editor, Bob Moore, has submitted a revised draft of the
> > Policy QoS
> > Information Model,
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-policy-qos-info
> > -model-05.txt
> >
> > This draft is believed to address the comments raised by the
> > AD review,
> > without violating the consensus of the working group on any
> > items.  If Bob
> > has time he will write up a description of the changes, but
> > he has already
> > done a huge amount of work for us.  Please take a look at
> > this draft and
> > speak quickly if you see problems.  I do not anticipate
> > having an explicit
> > additional working group last call, but am giving you this
> > window before
> > asking Bert to run with this draft.
> >
> > Thanks again to Bob for his efforts,
> > Joel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Policy mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy
> >