RE: Revised Draft
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Wed, 21 May 2003 23:06:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15501A9F49C@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
Will do. I assume you mean http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-policy-qos-info-model-05.txt Thanks, Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: woensdag 21 mei 2003 20:42 > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Policy] Revised Draft > > > Bert, please accept the current draft of this information > model and begin > the IESG processing to start the IETF last call, etc. The > editor has made > the corrections you have requested, and the working group is > happy with the > changes (or so burned out that they can not be unhappy.) > > Yours, > Joel > > PS: Again many thanks to Bob for his editing work. > > At 03:02 PM 5/20/2003 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: > >Mmm.. on page 46 and following I see afew FALSEFALSE values. > >Is that correct? If not, then you can keep that to be > >fixed at a later point. > > > >Same for [DIFF-MIB] Refernce, it should refernece RFC3289 > > > >For those who want to see the I-Ds with colored changes, > >See > > http://psg.com/~bwijnen/qpim.html > > http://psg.com/~bwijnen/qddim.html > > > >Is the doc ready for me to send it into IETF Last Call? > > > >Thanks, > >Bert > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: donderdag 8 mei 2003 20:15 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [Policy] Revised Draft > > > > > > > > > The editor, Bob Moore, has submitted a revised draft of the > > > Policy QoS > > > Information Model, > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-policy-qos-info > > > -model-05.txt > > > > > > This draft is believed to address the comments raised by the > > > AD review, > > > without violating the consensus of the working group on any > > > items. If Bob > > > has time he will write up a description of the changes, but > > > he has already > > > done a huge amount of work for us. Please take a look at > > > this draft and > > > speak quickly if you see problems. I do not anticipate > > > having an explicit > > > additional working group last call, but am giving you this > > > window before > > > asking Bert to run with this draft. > > > > > > Thanks again to Bob for his efforts, > > > Joel > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Policy mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy > > > > >