Re: OIDs for PCIMe LDAP schema (was: no subject)
Robert Moore <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:06:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mircea, I have to agree with Kurt here, especially since he played a key role in developing the IANA practices for LDAP. When we got the root OID for PCLS, we definitely thought of it as belonging to the document. If PCeLS were just PCLSv2, we *might* (or might not) decide that it's "the same document," and hence that it should continue registering OIDs under the same root. But if PCeLS really corresponds to PCIMe, then it's not PCLSv2: it *extends* PCLS, rather than updating it. By this reasoning, it's not the same document as PCLS, and thus should get a new root OID from IANA. Regards, Bob Bob Moore WebSphere Advanced Design and Technology WebSphere Platform System House IBM Software Group +1-919-254-4436 [email protected] "Kurt D. Zeilenga" To: [email protected] <[email protected] cc: g> Subject: [Policy] OIDs for PCIMe LDAP schema (was: no subject) Sent by: policy-admin@ietf .org 06/29/2003 02:05 PM Mircea, I believe 1) (new OID) is the most appropriate option. draft-ietf-policy-core requests an OID be assigned to it for schema elements it specifies. It does not detail considerations for how other documents my make sub-delegations, hence other documents need to get their own delegation from IANA. Kurt _______________________________________________ Policy mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy