RE: OIDs for PCIMe LDAP schema (was: no subject)

Kurt, Bob,

Thank you both for the clarifications. 

Since I received your messages shortly after having submitted PCELS-02, this
revision does not reflect your recommendation. I'll make the changes and
submit a new ID as soon as that will be possible again after the IETF
meetings.

Regards,
Mircea.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Moore [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:06 AM
> To: Kurt D. Zeilenga
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Policy] OIDs for PCIMe LDAP schema (was: no subject)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mircea,
> 
> I have to agree with Kurt here, especially since he played a 
> key role in
> developing the IANA practices for LDAP.  When we got the root 
> OID for PCLS,
> we definitely thought of it as belonging to the document.  If 
> PCeLS were
> just PCLSv2, we *might* (or might not) decide that it's "the same
> document," and hence that it should continue registering OIDs 
> under the
> same root.  But if PCeLS really corresponds to PCIMe, then 
> it's not PCLSv2:
> it *extends* PCLS, rather than updating it.  By this 
> reasoning, it's not
> the same document as PCLS, and thus should get a new root OID 
> from IANA.
> 
> Regards,
> Bob
> 
> Bob Moore
> WebSphere Advanced Design and Technology
> WebSphere Platform System House
> IBM Software Group
> +1-919-254-4436
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
>                                                               
>                                                               
>            
>                       "Kurt D.                                
>                                                               
>            
>                       Zeilenga"                To:       
> [email protected]                                               
>                 
>                       <[email protected]        cc:            
>                                                               
>            
>                       g>                       Subject:  
> [Policy] OIDs for PCIMe LDAP schema (was: no subject)         
>                 
>                       Sent by:                                
>                                                               
>            
>                       policy-admin@ietf                       
>                                                               
>            
>                       .org                                    
>                                                               
>            
>                                                               
>                                                               
>            
>                                                               
>                                                               
>            
>                       06/29/2003 02:05                        
>                                                               
>            
>                       PM                                      
>                                                               
>            
>                                                               
>                                                               
>            
>                                                               
>                                                               
>            
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mircea,
> 
> I believe 1) (new OID) is the most appropriate option.
> draft-ietf-policy-core requests an OID be assigned to
> it for schema elements it specifies. It does not detail
> considerations for how other documents my make sub-delegations,
> hence other documents need to get their own delegation
> from IANA.
> 
> Kurt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy
>