Re: Extended RETR - version 2
"Mike Gahrns" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pop3ext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Re: Extended RETR - version 2Anders writes: >> A quick grep over the logfiles of a large ISP (>1 Mio POP accesses a day) >> tells me that less then 0.1% of the connections die while sending something >> to the client. There are another about 0.2% where the client didn't properly >> close the connection with QUIT, but they happen while waiting for the next >> command. >Where in the world is the above statistics from? >A few years/months from now this number is probably going to increase, >given the nature of the Internet, i.e. everything escalates beyond >everyone's imagination. :) Not necessarily. I think a strong case can be made that while the volume may increase, the quality is also increasing as well. As I mentioned earlier, I have no objections to this extension from a technical point of view, just pointing out that before we extend POP, lets make sure that we are solving a real problem. A large part of POP's success is due to its simplicity.