Re: Extended RETR - version 2

> >Where in the world is the above statistics from?

Correction: the above question was meant to be referring to geographic
location (please excuse my malformed translation).

> Not necessarily.  I think a strong case can be made that while the volume
> may increase, the quality is also increasing as well.  As I mentioned
> earlier, I have no objections to this extension from a technical point of
> view, just pointing out that before we extend POP, lets make sure that we
> are solving a real problem.  A large part of POP's success is due to its
> simplicity.

Exactly what are you referring to by "quality", please specify.

// Anders