Re: [rbridge] working group last call for PPP TRILL protocol control protocol [was Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-02.txt]

On 1/21/11 9:37 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> I have reviewed this draft and believe it should be advanced as a
> proposed standard but I suggest the following minor tweaks:
> 
> I believe references are not allowed in an Abstract so you may have to
> explicitly say "RFC 1661" if necessary, or perhaps this reference can
> just be moved to the first occurrence of PPP in the body.
> 
> Section 2.3, in the first sentence, for clarify suggest changing "the
> IS-IS Payload" with "the IS-IS Payload, starting with the IS-IS
> Network Layer Protocol Identifier byte (0x83),"

Both changes sound good to me; thanks!

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext