Re: Errata classification

James Carlson <[email protected]> Wed, 09 May 2012 06:53:09 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.pppext
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Donald Eastlake wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The following errata sounds reasonable but could people give me their opinion?
> 
>     http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1924

At Sun, I worked on an implementation of RFC 2759, and verified the
resulting compatibility with Microsoft RAS.  The erratum is correct.
The password is indeed hashed using UTF-16-LE encoding.  (I suspect, but
cannot prove, that it was originally defined on NT using UCS-2-LE rather
than UTF-16-LE.  But the distinction almost certainly doesn't matter.)

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext