Re: Errata classification

Thanks,
Donald
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D
=A0Donald E. Eastlake 3rd=A0=A0 +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
=A0155 Beaver Street,=A0Milford, MA 01757 USA
[email protected]


On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:53 AM, James Carlson <[email protected]> wr=
ote:
> Donald Eastlake wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following errata sounds reasonable but could people give me their op=
inion?
>>
>> =A0 =A0 http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3D1924
>
> At Sun, I worked on an implementation of RFC 2759, and verified the
> resulting compatibility with Microsoft RAS. =A0The erratum is correct.
> The password is indeed hashed using UTF-16-LE encoding. =A0(I suspect, but
> cannot prove, that it was originally defined on NT using UCS-2-LE rather
> than UTF-16-LE. =A0But the distinction almost certainly doesn't matter.)
>
> --
> James Carlson =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 42.703N 71.076W =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <carlsonj@w=
orkingcode.com>
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext