Re: IANA Considerations for PPP to Proposed Standard

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 11:34, Thomas Narten wrote:
> > The PPPEXT Working Group recommends that IANA Considerations for PPP,
> > draft-schryver-pppext-iana-00.txt, be advanced to Proposed Standard.
> 
> (back from vacation now...) I have some nits I'll forward later, but
> overall the document looks fine to me, so I'll start the last call.
> 
> I think BCP is the better categorization. Other IANA documents have
> been issued as BCPs, and it doesn't really make sense to advance this
> type of document along the standards track (how do we test for
> interoperability?).

Good point.  BCP sounds like the right thing to do.

> Regarding the IPR boilerplate, RFC 2026 requires all documents to have
> it, though we haven't been consistent about enforcing it (until more
> recently) except in cases where IPR was know to have been asserted.
> 
> Thomas