RE: PPP IPV6 Control Protocol Extensions for Prefix

Hello james

please look into my below comment

Daniel


Soohong Daniel Park writes:
> I am wondering if this draft should be discussed as an interesting 
> draft and taked at PPPEXT WG.

>My vote is "no."

This draft is originated with draft-ietf-pppext-ipv6-dns-addr-02.txt
to update RFC 2472.


>This draft duplicates functionality already in RFC 2461 (IPv6 Neighbor
Discovery), and I don't see a reason to allow it here.

I didn't address prefix advertisement such as NDP. The intent of my
draft is to address
a method of obtaining the valid prefix. If the local peer requests an
invalid prefix,
the remote peer specifies the prefix by this option, and returing the
IPv6 valid prefix.




-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <[email protected]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.234W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.497N   Fax +1 781 442 1677