RE: removing the milestones

"Nelson, David" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pppext
Message-ID <2A5E4540D4D5934D9A1E7E0B0FDB2D69E18F99@MAANDMBX2.ets.enterasys.com>
> I'm not dismissing the standards process as "irrelevant."  Those are
> your words, not mine.
> 
> What I did say was that it wasn't clear whether advancing the
> documents (after so many years has passed) has any substantial value
> for anyone consuming the documents.  I don't know that it does.

I think I understand what Glen is saying.  If implementing product based
on documents at Proposed Standard is "good enough" for the industry, why
would anyone ever expend the extra energy to advance a document to Draft
Standard of Full Standard?

I also understand that the IETF cannot compel work, so if there is
currently no interest...

-- Dave


_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.