RE: removing the milestones
"Nelson, David" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pppext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2A5E4540D4D5934D9A1E7E0B0FDB2D69E18F99@MAANDMBX2.ets.enterasys.com> |
> I'm not dismissing the standards process as "irrelevant." Those are > your words, not mine. > > What I did say was that it wasn't clear whether advancing the > documents (after so many years has passed) has any substantial value > for anyone consuming the documents. I don't know that it does. I think I understand what Glen is saying. If implementing product based on documents at Proposed Standard is "good enough" for the industry, why would anyone ever expend the extra energy to advance a document to Draft Standard of Full Standard? I also understand that the IETF cannot compel work, so if there is currently no interest... -- Dave _______________________________________________ Pppext mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext