warning suggestions for draft-bberry-pppoe-credit
James Carlson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pppext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Our AD has asked for some suggested warning text that can be added to this draft, as the author has asked for it to be published as an Informational RFC. (Please -- no matter which side of this divide you're on -- direct your flames to /dev/null. Yes, I and the rest of the folks here know all of the arguments on both sides. We don't need to go over the issues again.) Here's my suggestion. Feel free to suggest better wording. "The PPP Extensions Working Group (pppext) has reservations about the desirability of the feature described in this document. In particular, it solves a general problem at an inappropriate layer and it may have unpredictable interactions with higher and lower level protocols. The consensus of the working group is that implementors would be better advised either to seek ways of making the underlying radio link suitable for general Ethernet-like use, or to abandon the incomplete emulation of Ethernet entirely." -- James Carlson, KISS Network <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ Pppext mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext