RE: warning suggestions for draft-bberry-pppoe-credit

"Stan Ratliff \(sratliff\)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pppext
Message-ID <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76401170791@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com>
James/All -- 

When viewed in the context of 802.11 radios, I would agree that the 
applicability of this draft is suspect. However, when viewed in the 
context of TDMA radios, that point-to-point characteristics, this 
RFC does seem applicable. 

It allows the radio vendors to do what they do best, and at the same
time, allows router vendors to do the same. Propagation of the P2P 
characteristics of TDMA links back into the router allows the router
to allocate QoS queues on a radio link-by-radio link basis, giving 
good granularity and control. 

So, at the worst, I would like to see some text in the draft that 
states the applicability to TDMA-like radios, as opposed to what 
you have here. 

Regards,
Stan
  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
>On Behalf Of James Carlson
>Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:27 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [Pppext] warning suggestions for draft-bberry-pppoe-credit
>
>Our AD has asked for some suggested warning text that can be added to
>this draft, as the author has asked for it to be published as an
>Informational RFC.  (Please -- no matter which side of this divide
>you're on -- direct your flames to /dev/null.  Yes, I and the rest of
>the folks here know all of the arguments on both sides.  We don't need
>to go over the issues again.)
>
>Here's my suggestion.  Feel free to suggest better wording.
>
>  "The PPP Extensions Working Group (pppext) has reservations about
>  the desirability of the feature described in this document.  In
>  particular, it solves a general problem at an inappropriate layer
>  and it may have unpredictable interactions with higher and lower
>  level protocols.  The consensus of the working group is that
>  implementors would be better advised either to seek ways of making
>  the underlying radio link suitable for general Ethernet-like use, or
>  to abandon the incomplete emulation of Ethernet entirely."
>
>-- 
>James Carlson, KISS Network                    
><[email protected]>
>Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.232W   Vox +1 
>781 442 2084
>MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 
>781 442 1677
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pppext mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
>

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.