Re: Anyone working on 4310-bis?

Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Organization Dot And Co
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Andrew,

Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> 2009-10-27 21:05
> I have of late observed a couple possibly pointy corners in RFC 4310,
> and Howard Eland just pointed out to me a pretty big operational
> problem in it, so I am wondering whether anyone is working on updates
> to it. 

I'm not specifically working on it, but I would advise anyone dealing
with DNSSEC and EPP to have a look at what .CZ did and what .EU will
do soon, as they both created other extensions to handle DNSSEC with
EPP. Maybe other registries too. Sorry if you did that already.

I'm not judging pro or in favor of any other extension, 
but I believe that having a look at the currently deployed EPP
dealings with DNSSEC would be a good idea in light of future work on
4310.

Hope that helps.

-- 
Patrick Mevzek
Dot and Co <http://www.dotandco.com/> <http://www.dotandco.net/>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.