Re: Anyone working on 4310-bis?
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27 okt 2009, at 21.16, Patrick Mevzek wrote: > Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> 2009-10-27 21:05 >> I have of late observed a couple possibly pointy corners in RFC 4310, >> and Howard Eland just pointed out to me a pretty big operational >> problem in it, so I am wondering whether anyone is working on updates >> to it. > > I'm not specifically working on it, but I would advise anyone dealing > with DNSSEC and EPP to have a look at what .CZ did and what .EU will > do soon, as they both created other extensions to handle DNSSEC with > EPP. Maybe other registries too. Sorry if you did that already. > > I'm not judging pro or in favor of any other extension, > but I believe that having a look at the currently deployed EPP > dealings with DNSSEC would be a good idea in light of future work on > 4310. We use epp and DNSSEC in .SE since a while back. What are the issues you think? Patrik -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to [email protected]