Re: draft-gould-rfc4310bis-00.txt Submitted forReview
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 14 dec 2009, at 21.20, Ulrich Wisser wrote: >> I propose adding the zero or more case to the draft for secDNS:chg. Please respond to the list or to me privately if you support this or don’t support this along with any reasons. > > It does make life easier for many web application programmers. So I would like to second that change. I also think this is needed, or as I said earlier, any mechanism that make it easy for someone that do _not_ support 4310 to at least remove the DS data in the registry. Patrik -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to [email protected]