RE: draft-gould-rfc4310bis-00.txt Submitted forReview

Makes sense to me.

Michael Young 


   
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:32 AM
To: Ulrich Wisser
Cc: EPP Provreg
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] draft-gould-rfc4310bis-00.txt Submitted
forReview

On 14 dec 2009, at 21.20, Ulrich Wisser wrote:

>> I propose adding the zero or more case to the draft for secDNS:chg.
Please respond to the list or to me privately if you support this or don’t
support this along with any reasons.  
> 
> It does make life easier for many web application programmers. So I would
like to second that change.

I also think this is needed, or as I said earlier, any mechanism that make
it easy for someone that do _not_ support 4310 to at least remove the DS
data in the registry.

   Patrik


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to [email protected]



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to [email protected]