Re: Presentation on EPP present and future
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:30:17AM +0200, Ulrich Wisser wrote: > The nice thing about all the extensions in the wild is, that we are now > seeing real world business needs for EPP. We could try to filter out a > common set of extensions needs and create one or more new standard > extensions. One way to tackle this would be for someone to put together draft-epp-common-profile that would outline the extensions (including -- or not -- the base domain, host, contact extensions) that support the widest interoperation. That is not actually a change to the protocol as such, though it is of course an overall change to the operating protocol as deployed. I think it would be very helpful to have a draft that one could discuss, however. But since I work for neither a registry nor a (real) registrar, I'm not offering to write it. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] Shinkuro, Inc. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to [email protected]