Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Patrik Wallstrom <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 3, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Patrik Faltstrom (pfaltstr) wrote: > On 2 jul 2011, at 18:46, "Patrick Mevzek" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So, Patrick, I agree with you, registries should "try to" see what exists >> already before reinventing the wheel, but how to achieve that? I >> honestly have no idea while still believing it is a worthwile goal. > > We can not police, but IETF can help by "stop being so nice" and ack that two registries that require ANY change in the registrar epp implementation are NOT interoperable. If just that is known, we are in a better situation. That would be very hard for the IETF to do for a protocol that the IETF claims to be extensible, right? If you want protocols that can be policed like that, at least that word should not be in the name of the standard. :) _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg