Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
"Patrik Faltstrom (pfaltstr)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4 jul 2011, at 12:07, "Patrik Wallstrom" <[email protected]> wrote: >> We can not police, but IETF can help by "stop being so nice" and ack that two registries that require ANY change in the registrar epp implementation are NOT interoperable. If just that is known, we are in a better situation. > > That would be very hard for the IETF to do for a protocol that the IETF claims to be extensible, right? If you want protocols that can be policed like that, at least that word should not be in the name of the standard. :) Absolutely correct! As I have said before, I was the area director and because of that somewhat responsible when epp was standardized. I did then not envision what problems would arise. Patrik _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg