Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type

Theo Kramer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 03 Jul 2011, at 5:51 AM, Patrik Faltstrom (pfaltstr) wrote:

> On 2 jul 2011, at 18:46, "Patrick Mevzek" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> So, Patrick, I agree with you, registries should "try to" see what exists
>> already before reinventing the wheel, but how to achieve that? I
>> honestly have no idea while still believing it is a worthwile goal.
> 
> We can not police, but IETF can help by "stop being so nice" and ack that two registries that require ANY change in the registrar epp implementation are NOT interoperable. If just that is known, we are in a better situation.
> 
>> Maybe registrars (as a group) + independant implementors should try to
>> raise their voice together...
> 
> I think/hope that is what is now happening? ;-)
> 
>   Patrik - tired of all non-interoperable registry inventions in epp

The OASIS ebCPPA protocol defines a mechanism for trading partners to implement a collaborative business process by defining a collaboration profile. Perhaps such an approach could be investigated for EPP Registries and Registrars to formalize interoperability with the formal collaboration profiles registered with ICANN or IETF ...

-- 
Regards
Theo

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.