Re: draft-kong-epp-cdn-dnssec-mapping-00 Submitted for Review
"Ning Kong" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi James, > To meet your requirement of having a domain and it's variants inherit the > same attributes the Key Data Interface of RFC 5910 could be used. IMO, the Key Data Interface of RFC 5910 is only designed for single domain name. So I think it's necessary to extend the <secDNS:keyData> element (for example < secDNS:keyData type="single/bulk">) in order to let the users (registrars/registries) know whether the key is for single domain name or bulk. > The key value of the extension that you drafted is managing the DS in bulk. > My suggestion is to support managing the DS individually with RFC 5731 and > RFC 5910 and to make your extension as an option for registrars that have the > need to manage them in bulk. It would be good to hear from the registrars > if managing DS in bulk is needed. Thanks for your partly positive comments. I do hope to get more comments from the registrars. That's why I sent email on this mailing list ;-) IMHO, I think our extension might be useful to not only registrars but also registries. So I do hope we can hear from more registries related on CDN registration. Ning _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg