Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Blacknight Internet Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/01/12 21:51, Gould, James wrote: >> I mentioned that very idea on this list before Christmas. The rough >> consensus >> was that things like a registry policy ought to be provided >> independently of >> EPP. Some also expressed scepticism that it'd even be possible to >> account for >> all the possible variations on registry policy. It's something I've been >> working on during my free time, but due to my lack of free time lately, >> is not >> something I've made as much progress on as I'd like. > > A goal is to provide 90% of the feature and policy information to help > drive the client logic. The mapping certainly wouldn't be small and might > have to make external references for things like reserved names. I have > done some work on it, but I wanted to know if there is interest in it. > One of the key attributes would be the phases of the TLD (sunrise, rights, > steadyState) with start and end dates. I might be dreaming that something > useful could be created, but it might be worth a shot. I'd be happy to see what work you've done on this so far, and I'll see if there's anything I can contribute from the work I've done. *Anything* in this regard is a good thing, even if it does provide 90% of the policy information, that means less guesswork and special-purpose hackery for registrars to deal with. Pairing this up with an informational RFC on best current practice would help get us close to 100%. K. -- Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381 Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/> 12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg