Re: Changes we'd make to EPP, was Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt

Ulrich,

Can you provide a reference to the extension created by .SE for registry
changes for review?  Using a command (obj:delete) in response to a command
(poll) would not meet RFC 5730.  Use of obj:creData I don't believe would
match the context.  Use of obj:infData could work since it's the most
generic to cover any changes, but it wouldn't provide any specific
information on a garbage collection delete except for maybe text in the
<msgQ><msg> element (e.g. "deleted - orphaned" or something like that).
This is not clean but it wouldn¹t require any new extensions or mappings.
 



--
  
JG
 

 
James Gould
Principal Software Engineer
[email protected] <http://[email protected]>
 
703-948-3271 (Office)
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
VerisignInc.com







On 1/17/12 3:12 AM, "Ulrich Wisser" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>here at .Se we have done some extension to notify registrars of database
>changes done by the registry. Today I believe that we do not even need
>an extension for that.
>
>To notify the registrar of changes we could use
>   obj:creData
>   obj:infData
>   obj:delete
>for the respective change. I realize that obj:delete is actually used as
>command but there is nothing in the xsd file that prevents reusing it as
>response. The absence of clTRID would indicate that the command was
>initiated by the registry.
>
>/Ulrich
>
>_______________________________________________
>provreg mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg