Re: Changes we'd make to EPP, was Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | wampumpeag |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/17/12 3:12 AM, Ulrich Wisser wrote: > here at .Se we have done some extension to notify registrars of > database changes done by the registry. I proposed a push mechanism to notify clients, it was not adopted, so the event model is one-sided, having only poll. > ... Today I believe that we do not > even need an extension for that. > > To notify the registrar of changes we could use > obj:creData > obj:infData > obj:delete > for the respective change. I realize that obj:delete is actually used > as command but there is nothing in the xsd file that prevents reusing > it as response. The absence of clTRID would indicate that the command > was initiated by the registry. Overloading. Cute, but if one were to change EPP some restrictions that were reasonable in a universe of a half-dozen registries and about an order of magnitude larger registrars may be worth reconsideration. Eric _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg