Re: Changes we'd make to EPP, was Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17.01.12 17:19, Patrik Fältström wrote: > On 17 jan 2012, at 09:12, Ulrich Wisser<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> here at .Se we have done some extension to notify registrars of database changes done by the registry. > > This is a question of definitions. The changes are made in the registry due to operations requested by another registrar. I can not remind myself of any operation originating in the registry. Ulrich do remind me if I am wrong. .SE puts message in the poll queue for any change done to the objects in the database. Transfer, expire, deactivate, delete, changes to status (e.g. SERVER_HOLD on ADR), ... /Ulrich > > Patrik > >> Today I believe that we do not even need an extension for that. >> >> To notify the registrar of changes we could use >> obj:creData >> obj:infData >> obj:delete >> for the respective change. I realize that obj:delete is actually used as command but there is nothing in the xsd file that prevents reusing it as response. The absence of clTRID would indicate that the command was initiated by the registry. >> >> /Ulrich >> >> _______________________________________________ >> provreg mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg >> _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg