Re: Changes we'd make to EPP, was Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt
InterNetX - Marco Schrieck <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | InterNetX GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, At 18.01.12 09:23, worte Ulrich Wisser: > > .SE puts message in the poll queue for any change done to the objects > in the database. Transfer, expire, deactivate, delete, changes to > status (e.g. SERVER_HOLD on ADR), ... We as registrar that have implemented many registry APIs must already handle this. This is done by other registries in the same kind. So there is only a map between this poll messages to existing method like "contact deleted by registry". If we have an out of band notification we have to manage extra credentials, protocol implementations, montoring, etc... This is from the operative and development view bad. My opinion is using the poll queue is good. The registry should do the GC periodically, to avoid many poll messages, maybe it can send many deleted contacts via one poll message with a maximum on contacts per message (eg 1000). Maybe there should also be a limit per day? Btw. a kind of bulk operation is still existing with obj:check where it is allowed to check multiple objects at once. Marco -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPFooKAAoJEN9yMHEBd2Hnz2oIAKeoaFda0TOPGN/TLkni7+l3 SWQpS9/s4PKwFpLP8NT/lMbQh+7KRBktxDHGgth+R5P0wljuSI4662dFQyXWa7ZS y8Rpsf/VTJcksdnzEIO142HgQbm92AVI1O5HXa9tkBdu5T9Z72mjfoEzH5IQtpTq IOXCj2L1XeCJJ6yyZwhNsMHIzehWIFEIZMJZvayU8DN08L6FYhVOHc49Dt6PEdSz bBsuwsFp+zZyL7IdoYHm6qX0/NxDBybiTmKDpK44GE9MS4q453UaV+FVdwE2s+Cs vKoOd+CTMg4SkGQ2tYf0ZNrvNetV+UKsFfu5UDOmXJDznffUY0J14IiLY6iVomk= =45Um -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg