Re: Changes we'd make to EPP, was Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Blacknight Internet Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/01/12 16:58, MICHAEL YOUNG wrote: > I think there needs to be a reasonable period where you can determine a > contact object has been abandoned. Is there really a point to leaving > contacts around that haven't been associated for years? AFNIC (.fr, &c.) do garbage collection already, albeit without notifications. Their policy is that a contact that has been unlinked for six continuous months is purged. Is a reasonable policy, although from a registrar's perspective, a notification on the message queue would be nice. > That's certainly the case in the older EPP registries - contact bloat. > Where this gets to be annoying is in escrow deposits - costs money for no > added value to anyone. Why bloat up escrow deposits with a bunch of dead > contacts in the first place? I'm in full an total agreement, not to mention the legal implications as far as data retention laws go. K. -- Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381 Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/> 12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg