Re: Changes we'd make to EPP, was Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Blacknight Internet Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/01/12 17:28, Patrik Fältström wrote: > The problem here is that once again registries talk about "bloat" and > "increased cost" and because of that want to do operations that imply > inconsistencies with registrars databases, while registrars argue that > for them it is not a problem at all with many contact records and that > it is worse if registries make commands that have implications in > their database. Keep in mind that this is actually a proposal coming from an employee of a registrar! > Is this not a clear sign we must be better on working together? > > My suggestion was because of that that registrars make the gc command > and registries report back what was deleted. I personally would prefer it happen automatically as the registry feels is necessary, but that the notification is sent out at least a day before the purge occurs. K. -- Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381 Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/> 12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg