Re: Changes we'd make to EPP, was Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt

Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Organization Blacknight Internet Solutions
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 17/01/12 17:28, Patrik Fältström wrote:

> The problem here is that once again registries talk about "bloat" and
> "increased cost" and because of that want to do operations that imply
> inconsistencies with registrars databases, while registrars argue that
> for them it is not a problem at all with many contact records and that
> it is worse if registries make commands that have implications in
> their database.

Keep in mind that this is actually a proposal coming from an employee of
a registrar!

> Is this not a clear sign we must be better on working together?
> 
> My suggestion was because of that that registrars make the gc command
> and registries report back what was deleted.

I personally would prefer it happen automatically as the registry feels is
necessary, but that the notification is sent out at least a day before the
purge occurs.

K.

-- 
Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer
PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/>
12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland
Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.