Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | AFNIC |
| Message-ID | <1326963180.2651.1470.camel@citrine> |
Le mercredi 18 janvier 2012 à 12:27 +0000, Hollenbeck, Scott a écrit : > > EPP probably should have had more focus > > right from the start in addressing bulk operations. > > The use case for bulk operations *was* carefully considered - and not selected for inclusion in the core protocol. In my view it is done in part, since you can use multiple objects in check operations. Which also creates some nice interoperability issues since each registry put a limit on the number of objets per check command... -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg