Re: Changes we'd make to EPP

Le mercredi 18 janvier 2012 à 11:31 +0000, Keith Gaughan a écrit :
> On 17/01/12 18:12, Klaus Malorny wrote:
> 
> > - I just had an insane idea to avoid poll messages about the deletion of
> >   contacts -- you may forget it just after you have finished
> >   reading it (or even before): One could introduce an expiration date for
> >   contacts. If a contact is created, it is set to one year in the future.
> >   As long as the contact is used at least by one object, it is automatically
> >   renewed, let's say a quarter before it expires. The registrar can either
> >   track the expiration date (and perform a contact:info/check to check
> >   its existence in case his recorded expiration date is in the past)
> >   or simply create new contacts, as many registrars do it today.
> >   For the registry, if the contact passes its expiration date, it is
> >   simply deleted by the registry without any further fuss.
> 
> That's effectively what AFNIC do with their GC mechanism, but the lack of
> notification is a bit of an irritation because it's easy for the registrar
> to lose track of when the contact actually expires.

.FR do send notifications when contacts are garbage collected. There is
one notification per contact.

Also, when the registrant does not fulfill the charter, after some
specific out-of-EPP procedure, domain names may be blocked and later
deleted, both actions which are also notified, with one notification per
domain (the notification is basically some part of domain:infData
content)

-- 
Patrick Mevzek

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg